Looking for Moneys on the Internet
My curiosity to know is causing me dollars. I’m not the earning moneys like I’m supposed to. Not that I have to but because I’ve been told that way (I believe many people too); going to school equates to privilege, getting higher education guarantees job(s) and financial security/stability. Good news though, I’ve been selected to present a paper at the Equator Symposium in Yogyakarta, Indonesia end of this month and I have decided to also return to Singapore as I figured that I am not going to ‘work for free’, in fact, at my own expense. I admit to feel a bit bitter about not being (fully) funded to go to Indonesia but despite that, there are so many pros for going since I can really spend a bit of time there to do research and network that can really bring about future good. Most important, returning to Singapore to stall my financial difficulties in Amsterdam; I’m going put myself to work while I’m back (like work that actually pays and has nothing to do with my practice).
My recent obsessions of certain subjects of interest have also led me to obsessively looking for money on the internet; scholarships, research grants, project grants and travel funds. One inevitably starts realizing how much knowledge production is dictated by granting institutions through a set of frameworks (from god knows where).
Lately, I am really interested in China’s new Economic Silk Road, where I see it as China’s attempt to return to its former glory. The ancient Silk Road was what connects between the East and the West through the harsh and inhospitable plains of Eurasia. The pioneering innovations such as the printing press and gunpowder found their way to Renaissance Europe. Western academics and scholars (especially the Americans and British) have been particularly critical of China’s new plans. Let’s call them Sinoskeptics. The unjust and biasedness of these Westerncentric academics and scholars are truly disgusting. I’m not siding China here (and you’ll see what is the main gist of this post). Some Sinoskeptics think that this is China’s blatant attack on the world order established by the United States through imperial motives and dominations, without considering the intrusiveness of current world order that is currently in place.
Yang Rui in this interview was speaking to Wang Gungwu, a prominent scholar from Malaysia currently teaching in Singapore and Australia and has been an ‘expert’ on the Overseas Chinese diaspora. With the way Yang frames his questions, allowed Wang Gungwu to immediately point out the inequalities of global institutions such as, the IMF, United Nations and so on, suggesting how China is continuously sidelined and oppressed by these institutions that have never thrived to be equal in their conception. And of course, this is what CCTV wants their viewers to hear. Yang, being an extremely prominent and popular TV host in China on the state-own channel, he often highlights the unjustness of the West. Furthermore, using a very particular set of vocabulary and language to constantly perpetuate notions of Sinocentrism and attack Sinoskeptics that is now becoming excessively propagandistic.
Shifting the focus a bit, but still on and in China, this is the “Third World 60 Years: The 60th Anniversary of Bandung Conference”, Hangzhou Forum, moderated by Chen Kuan-Hsing and Gao Shiming, organized by the Inter-Asia School. The reason why I’m drawn to this is because having met Hilmar Farid last year, I learnt a lot more about Indonesia’s history and the legacy of the Bandung Conference. Now the Director General of Culture at the Ministry of Education and Culture, Farid (in his presentation segment) came with a rather unique point of view; calling for the redefinition of the ‘nation-state’, promotion of transnational collectivity conversation. Although he did not explicitly drop the idea that we should ‘forget about Bandung’ but he did put forth the more urgent questions regarding the state affairs and the role of the state.
Through the roundtable talk, we can see that the ‘Bandung Effect’ did fail; the interactions between the speakers were not profoundly engaging, although all of them made valid points in respect of the interconnectivity between Asian, African and Latin countries 60 years after the Bandung Conference in 1955.
So I’m thinking about starting off my paper/presentation, A Political Grey Space: Decolonizing after Dewesternization, with what Farid (and many other critiques) had mentioned about the ‘failure’ of Bandung. How is dewesternization and decolonization taking place at the moment. And finally introducing notions of ‘ambivalence’ and ‘ambiguity’ as a method and transition to post-state thinking/imagination in the context of decoloniality. The ideas of ‘ambivalence’ and ‘ambiguity’ here is extremely applicable and already happening in Indonesia and is something countries around the region should learn from.
It’s brewing, it’s coming…
Articles written in English by Hilmar Farid
Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 27:
Interesting! How did that happen?
co-director (s) wrote on Oct 26:
Here's Farid and I talking about RFAOH together in our own languages ^^: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjPJHsEVtvc We're sure it'll all be good (particularly if it's not art ^^)
Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 14:
Well, I initially had plans to stopover in Jakarta for a couple of days but since my flight back to Singapore is covered I thought I shouldn't spend extra money (having too much fun) in Jakarta. And yes, Farid and I first met last September in Eindhoven, then again in Jakarta during the biennale. He's a (guest) tutor at the Dutch Art Institute.
Thanks! I'm a bit nervous and stressed to be honest! If I was actually producing stuff, I will definitely let you guys know.
co-director (s) wrote on Oct 13:
Wayne, I was thinking after reading this that you gotta meet our ex-resident Farid Rakun in Jakarta on the way to or from Yogyakarta, but he just told me that you guys have already met -- is that true? I knew the "artworld" is small but guess so is "artist-on-hiatus world". Good luck with your presentation, which we take is not "art practice" (;
Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 11:
I suppose exported cultures often take on different shades and meanings in the guise of capitalist marketing.
I think the context I'm trying to draw here is that we often feel Westernization is a given, or a norm even though some of these 'changes' or 'alteration' are sometimes really subtle. Having (just) traveled in Japan, I understand that Japan is "highly Westernized" but as compared to Singapore for example, the degree of Westernization is more serious because there was no 'original' culture or I should say, the colonial narrative had completely overwritten pre-existing culture and history. I don't like making food comparisons but since you brought it up; KFC in Singapore hardly has any changes. In fact, KFCs in Malaysia and Indonesia (and I can't recall if Philippines and Vietnam too) sell rice as part of their main menu but not in Singapore. McDonalds many years ago was selling nasi lemak (a local Malay delicacy eaten mainly in Singapore and Malaysia), and for some reason they discontinued it. We have curry sauce that comes with the McNuggets.
And a side note about this 'food comparison', in Europe these 'fastfood' Asian food are also by default Chinese food. If you go to "Indonesia restaurants", they are 'Europeanized'. I was in Lisbon and I saw a restaurant named, "Buddha Sushi". Then, I thought, what the hell has Buddha gotta do with sushi. That's like going to Asia, finding an Italian restaurant named, "Jesus Pizza Place". So I have doubts about the inverse. The fetishization is real. Plus, it is almost pointless trying to identifying all the differences...
http://chinadivide.com/2010/war-on-westernization-in-china.html
Here's a post by Kevin Slaten, where he managed to pinpoint some 'issues' of Westernization but completely missing the core notion of Westernization; which is the economical-political drift towards using methods of/from the West, eg. free market, 'democracy', participation of the UN, IMF and so on. I will go on and give a couple of solid examples of Dewesternization moves; AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) and BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). These are attempts to operate outside of the current world order led by the United States.
I looked at Homi K. Bhabha but not Bourriaud. I will look it up!
co-director (m) wrote on Oct 5:
Interesting. I'm admittedly under-read on dewesternisation or decolonization but I always think about Japan and how they import aspects of a foreign culture they find fascinating but always re-configure it to meet Japanese sensibilities. Like the ebi(shrimp) burger at McDonalds; or pizza with squid and kombu, or these rockabilly dancers who are kind of a Japanese caricaturization of the American 1950's teenager. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-ScMOs7kPk Similarly the "west" and western culture is hardly monolithic and is forever changing, and incorporating the cultures of the immigrants who move here. Its feels far more hybrid then a lot of identity politics cares to acknowledge. With respect to China, (and Russia) we see these post cold war communist states take to capitalism like ducks to water but with their own authoritarian 1 party spin. While western governments have been equally quick to adopt Chinese methods for cracking down on dissent.
I wonder if you have read much Homi Bhabha; or Nicholas Bourriaud's book on Altmodernism. I'm curious your thoughts on their ideas on these topics with respect to globalisms impact on art and culture.