Wayne Wang-Jie Lim, Singapore / Netherlands

Residency Period: 1 August 2016 - 30 June 2017


Bio

Incidentally conceived in China, raised in Singapore, Wayne Wang-Jie Lim is an art practitioner working and living in Amsterdam. Since 2009, he had exhibited and presented in shows at various venues, from the Institute of Contemporary Arts Singapore (ICAS), Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore (CCA), to the Singapore Art Museum. He was awarded the Winston Oh Travel Research Award in 2013 for a research in Hong Kong, a writer-in-residence at maumau Art Space in Istanbul, Turkey in 2015 and most recently part of a research-residency project co-funded by the Creative Europe Program of the EU, called “Understanding Territoriality” at Cittadellarte-Fondazione Pistoletto in Biella, Italy.

He is currently pursuing his MA at the Dutch Art Institute as a recipient of the Non-EU scholarship grant from ArtEZ Institute of the Arts. His current inquiry focuses on geopolitics, language, philosophy and history in relation to art and hence, experiments with formats that are not the conventional, such as, travelogues, thinking and the writerly.

URL: waynewjlim.com Instagram


On-hiatus Proposal Summary

During his BA studies, Wayne was drafted into the army for mandatory military service that brought a two-year halt to his “practice” — he practically made/produced nothing, and participated in a few minor exhibitions for which he only showed old works he had done in school. Instead, he read a lot, and in retrospect, “prepared” for his final year after his obligatory service ended. This was the first time he questioned what an “artistic practice” meant.

When he returned to finish his degree, he could no longer make art in the way he used to, and his production shifted to a focus on researching and writing, making strategic plans on practicing at the fringe of what can be called “art” before spending only a short couple months at actually producing the “artworks”. Though a national arts body has funded his projects and exhibitions, he is not recognized officially as an artist under the institutions’ national framework of what constitutes artistic practice. This simultaneously “insider / outsider” state has further led him to his current research.

As Wayne begins his hiatus, he will also be working towards his graduate degree, where his thesis-research explores the notion of “non-position/location”. He feels that this timing will prompt him to really ask himself how he could “nourish” himself and re-strategize his artistic practice in order to benefit from the artworld’s infrastructure/institutions but not be subsumed into the wider agenda of neoliberalism and nationalistic rhetoric as a contemporary art producer or a cultural and knowledge producer. He hopes to investigate alternative modes of art production with an ultimate goal of infiltrating the arts market from the peripherals while being completely non-positional and ambiguous. Or practically, what he has to do in order to survive as an artist in a way that will also afford him a comfortable living -- and not like a "poor artist".

During his residency at RFAOH, he primarily wants to spend time on brooding over the function of his “art” and his “practice”. He plans to use the stipend “for nourishment” by purchasing books and organizing a reading group, putting food on his table, paying for his website domain, buying a hashtag on his Instagram account, paying an exorbitant amount for a VIP ticket to an art fair to look at art-for-sale, etc. He also plans to routinely write and perhaps finally learn how to use Instagram to “market” his non-art/borderline art activities.


Final Report

What do I think about when I don't think? As I round up my last few beautiful days in the outskirts of Seoul before I have to head off to Beijing to reunite with my family for a well-deserved vacation, a defiant North Korean missile was fired at 6am this morning, and it landed in the sea not far from Hokkaido, Japan. While the US is conducting its 'regular’ — often unapologetic — military exercise with the South Koreans military, I am sitting here opening, closing, and reopening this report, contemplating — or even procrastinating — about I can possibly write.

“What am I doing here?”, is a question I routinely pose myself. I now wonder if my relentless pursuit of the never-ending “here’s” is perhaps too disruptive. In the same vein, I can’t seem to know where I want to be; except knowing where I do not want to be. It’s an excuse I sometimes use to cover up my escapism. On a different note, while noting the political context of the Korean Peninsula (or the nature of conflicts), I have been rethinking the difference between presence and occupation. It questions not just the essentialism of identity and place — if not nationalism, and the rhetorics of the nationstate — how else and what other ways to justify the existence of being/the conception of statehood. Where is the “inside” and/or the “outside”?

A year ago, I applied mainly with the intention to understand my own practice, and perhaps to find a “direction in my life”, in regards to being simultaneously, an "insider" and an "outsider" of where I come from. The combination of my trajectory at the Dutch Art Institute and RFAOH have certainly pushed my practice into a more theoretical, and political direction/place. With that in mind, it is, therefore, important to think, and employ strategies that bring about higher agency in one's (artistic) practice. Although my initial research premise relating to my thesis have changed — from a "non-position/location" to the "hyperrestrained order" — it nevertheless helped me to understand better my position or role (and even the escapism), and my relationship with the state (Singapore), that changes from being a citizen, a soldier, to an "artist" (as an occupation). I have seen this process as a crucial development — as a theoretical inquiry, and the understanding of the previous — in relation to my art practice. During my hiatus, I have learnt to bring research-traveling-writing to the forefront of my practice — not entirely inclined to the notion of producing artworks as the 'only' way of art-making. Ironically, I believe this journey — of art and life — will/can never truly be on a “hiatus”. If one is practicing life (thinking about Tehching Hsieh's talk), can we say or consider art as the medium of life, while life never stops, and art nourishes life?

The “here” now is post-hiatus. I am excited about what Beijing can I offer me, as well as what I can learn from this potential move. “Post-hiatus” is, so to speak, actually getting over an ex-lover, and confronting some fears I had the past couple years; anxieties and insecurities, where I don’t just ask myself the purpose of my existence at a physical location. It is about living through it, making decisions even if I won’t be liking it, whether its on life, art or love.


archives

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
       
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 
       
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
       
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
       
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    
       
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    
       
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
       
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   
       
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 
       
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
       

 

recent comments


Looking for Moneys on the Internet

My curiosity to know is causing me dollars. I’m not the earning moneys like I’m supposed to. Not that I have to but because I’ve been told that way (I believe many people too); going to school equates to privilege, getting higher education guarantees job(s) and financial security/stability. Good news though, I’ve been selected to present a paper at the Equator Symposium in Yogyakarta, Indonesia end of this month and I have decided to also return to Singapore as I figured that I am not going to ‘work for free’, in fact, at my own expense. I admit to feel a bit bitter about not being (fully) funded to go to Indonesia but despite that, there are so many pros for going since I can really spend a bit of time there to do research and network that can really bring about future good. Most important, returning to Singapore to stall my financial difficulties in Amsterdam; I’m going put myself to work while I’m back (like work that actually pays and has nothing to do with my practice). 

My recent obsessions of certain subjects of interest have also led me to obsessively looking for money on the internet; scholarships, research grants, project grants and travel funds. One inevitably starts realizing how much knowledge production is dictated by granting institutions through a set of frameworks (from god knows where). 

Lately, I am really interested in China’s new Economic Silk Road, where I see it as China’s attempt to return to its former glory. The ancient Silk Road was what connects between the East and the West through the harsh and inhospitable plains of Eurasia. The pioneering innovations such as the printing press and gunpowder found their way to Renaissance Europe. Western academics and scholars (especially the Americans and British) have been particularly critical of China’s new plans. Let’s call them Sinoskeptics. The unjust and biasedness of these Westerncentric academics and scholars are truly disgusting. I’m not siding China here (and you’ll see what is the main gist of this post). Some Sinoskeptics think that this is China’s blatant attack on the world order established by the United States through imperial motives and dominations, without considering the intrusiveness of current world order that is currently in place. 

Yang Rui in this interview was speaking to Wang Gungwu, a prominent scholar from Malaysia currently teaching in Singapore and Australia and has been an ‘expert’ on the Overseas Chinese diaspora. With the way Yang frames his questions, allowed Wang Gungwu to immediately point out the inequalities of global institutions such as, the IMF, United Nations and so on, suggesting how China is continuously sidelined and oppressed by these institutions that have never thrived to be equal in their conception. And of course, this is what CCTV wants their viewers to hear. Yang, being an extremely prominent and popular TV host in China on the state-own channel, he often highlights the unjustness of the West. Furthermore, using a very particular set of vocabulary and language to constantly perpetuate notions of Sinocentrism and attack Sinoskeptics that is now becoming excessively propagandistic. 

Shifting the focus a bit, but still on and in China, this is the “Third World 60 Years: The 60th Anniversary of Bandung Conference”, Hangzhou Forum, moderated by Chen Kuan-Hsing and Gao Shiming, organized by the Inter-Asia School. The reason why I’m drawn to this is because having met Hilmar Farid last year, I learnt a lot more about Indonesia’s history and the legacy of the Bandung Conference. Now the Director General of Culture at the Ministry of Education and Culture, Farid (in his presentation segment) came with a rather unique point of view; calling for the redefinition of the ‘nation-state’, promotion of transnational collectivity conversation. Although he did not explicitly drop the idea that we should ‘forget about Bandung’ but he did put forth the more urgent questions regarding the state affairs and the role of the state. 

Through the roundtable talk, we can see that the ‘Bandung Effect’ did fail; the interactions between the speakers were not profoundly engaging, although all of them made valid points in respect of the interconnectivity between Asian, African and Latin countries 60 years after the Bandung Conference in 1955. 

So I’m thinking about starting off my paper/presentation, A Political Grey Space: Decolonizing after Dewesternization, with what Farid (and many other critiques) had mentioned about the ‘failure’ of Bandung. How is dewesternization and decolonization taking place at the moment. And finally introducing notions of ‘ambivalence’ and ‘ambiguity’ as a method and transition to post-state thinking/imagination in the context of decoloniality. The ideas of ‘ambivalence’ and ‘ambiguity’ here is extremely applicable and already happening in Indonesia and is something countries around the region should learn from. 

It’s brewing, it’s coming… 

 

Articles written in English by Hilmar Farid

Leave a Comment (6)

Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 27:

Interesting! How did that happen?

co-director (s) wrote on Oct 26:

Here's Farid and I talking about RFAOH together in our own languages ^^: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjPJHsEVtvc We're sure it'll all be good (particularly if it's not art ^^)

Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 14:

Well, I initially had plans to stopover in Jakarta for a couple of days but since my flight back to Singapore is covered I thought I shouldn't spend extra money (having too much fun) in Jakarta. And yes, Farid and I first met last September in Eindhoven, then again in Jakarta during the biennale. He's a (guest) tutor at the Dutch Art Institute.

Thanks! I'm a bit nervous and stressed to be honest! If I was actually producing stuff, I will definitely let you guys know.

co-director (s) wrote on Oct 13:

Wayne, I was thinking after reading this that you gotta meet our ex-resident Farid Rakun in Jakarta on the way to or from Yogyakarta, but he just told me that you guys have already met -- is that true? I knew the "artworld" is small but guess so is "artist-on-hiatus world". Good luck with your presentation, which we take is not "art practice" (;

Wayne Lim wrote on Oct 11:

I suppose exported cultures often take on different shades and meanings in the guise of capitalist marketing.

I think the context I'm trying to draw here is that we often feel Westernization is a given, or a norm even though some of these 'changes' or 'alteration' are sometimes really subtle. Having (just) traveled in Japan, I understand that Japan is "highly Westernized" but as compared to Singapore for example, the degree of Westernization is more serious because there was no 'original' culture or I should say, the colonial narrative had completely overwritten pre-existing culture and history. I don't like making food comparisons but since you brought it up; KFC in Singapore hardly has any changes. In fact, KFCs in Malaysia and Indonesia (and I can't recall if Philippines and Vietnam too) sell rice as part of their main menu but not in Singapore. McDonalds many years ago was selling nasi lemak (a local Malay delicacy eaten mainly in Singapore and Malaysia), and for some reason they discontinued it. We have curry sauce that comes with the McNuggets.

And a side note about this 'food comparison', in Europe these 'fastfood' Asian food are also by default Chinese food. If you go to "Indonesia restaurants", they are 'Europeanized'. I was in Lisbon and I saw a restaurant named, "Buddha Sushi". Then, I thought, what the hell has Buddha gotta do with sushi. That's like going to Asia, finding an Italian restaurant named, "Jesus Pizza Place". So I have doubts about the inverse. The fetishization is real. Plus, it is almost pointless trying to identifying all the differences...

http://chinadivide.com/2010/war-on-westernization-in-china.html

Here's a post by Kevin Slaten, where he managed to pinpoint some 'issues' of Westernization but completely missing the core notion of Westernization; which is the economical-political drift towards using methods of/from the West, eg. free market, 'democracy', participation of the UN, IMF and so on. I will go on and give a couple of solid examples of Dewesternization moves; AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) and BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). These are attempts to operate outside of the current world order led by the United States.

I looked at Homi K. Bhabha but not Bourriaud. I will look it up!

co-director (m) wrote on Oct 5:

Interesting. I'm admittedly under-read on dewesternisation or decolonization but I always think about Japan and how they import aspects of a foreign culture they find fascinating but always re-configure it to meet Japanese sensibilities. Like the ebi(shrimp) burger at McDonalds; or pizza with squid and kombu, or these rockabilly dancers who are kind of a Japanese caricaturization of the American 1950's teenager. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-ScMOs7kPk Similarly the "west" and western culture is hardly monolithic and is forever changing, and incorporating the cultures of the immigrants who move here. Its feels far more hybrid then a lot of identity politics cares to acknowledge. With respect to China, (and Russia) we see these post cold war communist states take to capitalism like ducks to water but with their own authoritarian 1 party spin. While western governments have been equally quick to adopt Chinese methods for cracking down on dissent.

I wonder if you have read much Homi Bhabha; or Nicholas Bourriaud's book on Altmodernism. I'm curious your thoughts on their ideas on these topics with respect to globalisms impact on art and culture.