The Missing Post
I finally have a minute to post this, in response to Farid Rakun’s post No. 8.
He talked about what you can or cant call yourself within a certain practice, and I’ve had very similar thoughts about what I should (or can) call myself after I graduated, especially since I wasn’t making any work. I wasn’t able to say I’m an art student any more, which was my preferred identification before I graduate… and for a while after graduation I still said that, sometimes adding ‘oh yeah, I just graduated’. It sounded awkward; it was awkward in my head, so I had to find an alternative. ‘I studied art’, ‘I just graduated… art’, and ‘I’m not really doing anything at the moment’ were all used. Eventually I started to use my workplace as the identifier, but never said ‘I’m an artist’… why would I? I wasn’t MAKING anything, I spent a whole lot of time thinking, reading, writing and, stressing about many things, but never made any.
Of course my humble short-lived experience does not compare to Farid’s ten year one, but contrary to the conclusion he reached (or lack of), I had no problem calling myself an artist when I started this residency. I figured that if I’m officially not doing something then I must in a position to be doing it. I hope I make sense… doing everything by doing nothing…
There must be a neat, smart theory out there that articulately describes this, if anyone knows of one, please tell me.
Anyway, my conclusion is, I suppose, that it’s probably more comfortable calling yourself ‘anything’ as long as there’s context to justify it, which is what this residency does, provides context.
shinobu wrote on Nov 16:
Yeah, and "you(we) as the theory" is way more convincing and charming!
Batool wrote on Nov 16:
Farid found the theory! hahahaha... you are right though... one has to bump one's own head, basically
shinobu wrote on Nov 14:
You are the theory, Batool, you are. There are no French dudes who could articulate such as good as we go through this ourselves