Sunday Reading
BRAD TROEMEL – THE ACCIDENTAL AUDIENCE
Note on “Image Fundamentalists and Image Neoliberals”: I wonder why there cannot be a middle ground, where the context of a work is vital, but does not necessarily have to be grounded in the physical location of the work, And at the same time not have success be measured be selling ability of the work but rather in the degree of relevance it acquires.
Note on “It’s important to remember the accidental audience doesn’t think it’s in the first place. For them, these images are not bad art so much as the epitome of randomness”: why should there be an excuse to be baffled by art? The ‘WTF I don’t even…’ response does not need to be justified; art is essentially useless, if it weren’t, its function won’t make it the epitome and randomness and wouldn’t invoke bafflement.